Print
YM
E-mail
Mai mare|Mai mic

MPs Commission shows no arguments against Basescu

de     HotNews.ro
Joi, 22 martie 2007, 0:00


After three weeks of intense media attention, the Parliamentarian Commission for president Basescu's Suspension only managed to present a long list of accusations, without presenting any evidence to support allegations.

The final report simply refers to a series of addenda which, they claim, cover over 700 pages.

The Constitution breaches Basescu is accused of include "rendering the Constitutional Court timorous" or designating a prime minister without consulting all parties. The addenda may become secret in case MPs decide so and the people, called to express their vote in a referendum for Basescu's suspension, may never know what evidence the Commission had for its conclusions.

In brief:
- the seven pages of the report contain accusations, but no arguments whatsoever;
- MPs take into account the Constitution only when it's to their advantage;
- the report calls for a criminal investigation against the Integration Minister, but no law articles are invoked to support the demand;
- the addenda may become a secret because it contains data about the activity of intelligence services.

Accusations and conclusions:

1. political supporter attitude;
2. detouring the electors' intention by designating a prime minister before consulting all political parties and without any consideration for the electoral result;
3. brutal interventions in the Parliamentarian activity;
4. generating a climate of political instability and an artificial governmental crisis;
5. bringing a severe prejudice to the entire Parliament, described as a "dump house clinically dead", and to the Government, also depicted as "serving groups of interests";
6. subordinating the intelligence services and demanding the resignations of their heads;
7. assuming the right to legislation initiatives;
8. constantly acting as to submit the Government and taking its place on occasions;
9. forming institutions on the spot, like the National intelligence Community
10. abusively taking part in a Govt. session that wasn't scheduled to discuss problems in the president's area of competence;
11. refusing to name ministers nominated by the prime minister;
12. demanding publicly what files must gain priority in justice;
13. asking judges to resign;
14. commenting on the solidity of convictions
15. rendering the Constitutional Court timorous;
16. accepting procedures that included illegal phone taps
17. failing to present a national defense strategy;
18. patronizing economy players;
19. having personal initiatives in foreign policy

The end of the document refers to criminal acts, but also without any arguments.




















11 vizualizari


ESRI



Hotnews
Agenţii de ştiri

Siteul Hotnews.ro foloseste cookie-uri. Cookie-urile ne ajută să imbunatatim serviciile noastre. Mai multe detalii, aici.
hosted by
powered by
developed by
mobile version
Miercuri